Step-by-step computation for Macro-step 2: Difference between revisions
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
=== Step 2.2. - Computation of the various available tests === | === Step 2.2. - Computation of the various available tests === | ||
==== Micro-step 2.2.2. - Permanent Safe Harbour ==== | ==== Micro-step 2.2.2. - Permanent Safe Harbour ==== | ||
Line 47: | Line 45: | ||
==== Micro-step 2.2.4. - Transitional UTPR Safe Harbour ==== | ==== Micro-step 2.2.4. - Transitional UTPR Safe Harbour ==== | ||
=== Step 2.3. - Selection of the | === Step 2.3. - Selection of the most pertinent Safe harbour mechanism === | ||
=== Step 2.4. - Identification of MNE Groups in its initial phase of international activity === | |||
==== Purpose ==== | ==== Purpose ==== |
Revision as of 08:14, 31 December 2023
Purpose
The purpose of the Safe Harbour Analysis is to identify the Jurisdictions and Juridicition sub-perimeters that fall under Safe Harbour Provision and thus allow for an immediate nullification of the Top-Up Tax in the correspond Jurisidiction or Jurisdiction sub-perimeter, without having to provide the detailed information and or data required for the full Pillar 2 computation.
General Logic
In order to perform the Safe Harbour Analysis, the set of elections made by the Filing Constituent Entity will be combined by the set of financial data provided to test the various Safe harbour mechanisms and assess whether any of them are applicable to the Juridiction or Juridiction/sub-perimeter under study. If several are applicable the algorithm will select preferably the provision of the transitional safe harbour requesting the simplest set of data, to allow for the continuation of the use of the Transitional Safe harbour rules, in the upcoming years.
Data Input
The Data input for Macro-step 2 consists in :
- The list of Jurisdictions and Jurisdiction sub-perimeter derived from the Macro-step 1;
- The list of financial data aggregated at the right segmentation level for the relevant Safe Harbour;
The detailed matrix is available in the relevant section of the Pillar 2 Data Structure.
Data Output
The Data output for Macro-step 2 consists in :
- The final list of Jurisdictions and Jurisdictions sub-perimeters falling under Safe-Harbour provisions and therefore with Top-Up Tax equal to 0;
- The final list of Jurisdictions and Jurisdictions sub-perimeters for which a detailed Pillar 2 and Top-Up Tax will need to be performed.
The detailed matrix is available in the relevant section of the Pillar 2 Data Structure.
Detailed Step by step approach
Step 2.1. - Identification of the Non Material Constituent Entities
Step 2.2. - Computation of the various available tests
Micro-step 2.2.2. - Permanent Safe Harbour
De minimis test
Simplified ETR test
Routine Profit test
Micro-step 2.2.3. - QDMTT Safe Harbour
Micro-step 2.2.4. - Transitional CbCR Safe Harbour
De minimis test
Simplified ETR test
Routine Profit test
Micro-step 2.2.4. - Transitional UTPR Safe Harbour
Step 2.3. - Selection of the most pertinent Safe harbour mechanism
Step 2.4. - Identification of MNE Groups in its initial phase of international activity
Purpose
The purpose of the .
General Logic
This Step 1.2. will consist in .
Data Input
The Data input for Step 1.2. consists in :
- The list of
The detailed matrix is available in the relevant section of the Pillar 2 Data Structure.
Data Output
The Data output for Step 1.2. consists in :
- The list of
The detailed matrix is available in the relevant section of the Pillar 2 Data Structure.
Detailed computations
The list of Micro-Step is a follows :
- Micro-Step 1.2.1.
Micro-Step 1.2.1. Unknown subsidiaries
This step .
Micro-Step 1.2.2. Unknown parents
This .
This .